The long awaited and anticipated exposure draft law relating to Non-Arm’s Length Expenditure (NALE) were introduced to Parliament on 13 September 2023. We detail below a comparison between the current legislation and proposed amendments as well as areas of Australian Taxation Office (ATO) concern and key guidelines they will look for when determining if an arrangement is arm’s length.
The non-arm’s length income (NALI) rules impose the top marginal rate of tax (45%) on a portion, or in some instances, all of the income of a superannuation fund where parties have not dealt with each other on arm’s length terms.
As an extension to these laws, in July 2018 legislation came into force to include non-arm’s length expenses (NALE), meaning that we no longer just look at the income earned by a superannuation fund but also the expenses.
So, if a loss or outgoing is less than what would ordinarily have been derived if the parties had dealt with each other at arm’s length – this will now be caught!
The ATO’s interpretation of these NALE rules is there are two types of expenses, being either a ‘specific’ expense or a ‘general’ expense.
In January 2023, The Treasury proposed a change to the general expense NALE rules whereby rather than potentially tainting ‘all’ of the income of the fund as NALI, the amount of income that will be taxed as NALI will be limited to five (5) times the difference in the non-arm’s length expense amount incurred.
After initial consultation on these proposed changes, on 9 May 2023 the Government announced further changes in the Federal Budget stating that large APRA-regulated funds would no longer be subject to these provisions and for Self-Managed Superannuation Funds (SMSF) and small APRA-regulated funds, the key multiplier would be reduced to a rate of two (2) times the difference in the general expense incurred. Draft legislation was then released on 19 June 2023 for consultation, with a Bill introduced into Parliament on 13 September 2023.
This multiple essentially sets an ‘upper’ cap on general expenses to ensure that the total amount taxed at the highest marginal tax rate does not exceed the SMSFs total taxable income.
As a basic example as to how this would work, if there was general NALE of $1,000, this would give rise to $2,000 of NALI (provided there is sufficient taxable income) which would be taxed at 45%, resulting in $900 of tax to the fund. This represents an effective tax rate of 90% in respect to the NALE.
Note: For specific expenses, the new lower rate multiplier of 2 will not apply and the entire amount of income derived from the scheme will continue to be taxed as NALI.
Importantly, also introduced within this draft legislation was a limitation on the time period from which NALE can be applied, effectively restricting it’s application to dealings which were entered into until after 1 July 2018.
The ATO’s discusses allocating potential non-arm’s length expenses into the two categories:
This ruling also details the distinction between when the Trustee or Director of a corporate trustee performs work for their own SMSF. This type of work will be in either:
- using the staff, assets or equipment or under an insurance policy of their business or profession;
- activities pursuant to a licence and/or qualification relating to their own business, profession or employment) for example a plumber or electrician who performs work on an investment property owned by their SMSF that can only be completed by a licenced tradesperson.
- performing bookkeeping or accounting services;
- management of investment portfolios.
The ATO released TD 2023/D1 on 28 June 2023 outlining their views as to how the NALI and capital gains tax (CGT) provisions interact where a capital gain arises as a result of a non-arm’s length arrangement.
We summarise below the key takeaways from TD 2023/D1 below:
- The amount of the capital gain is more than the amount the Fund might have been expected to derive if the parties had been acting on arm’s length terms in relation to the scheme; or
- In gaining/producing the capital gain, NALE is incurred (including nil expenditure) in respect of the CGT asset that is less than the amount of a loss, outgoing or expense that the fund might have been expected to incur if the parties were dealing with each other on arm’s length terms, in relation to the scheme.
- the ‘non-arm’s length capital gain’ (no discount or losses applied); or
- the net capital gain.
The ATO has highlighted in their recent Taxpayer Alert 2023/2 on 15 June 2023, some areas of concern they have identified in a number of arrangements, particularly relating to non-arm’s length arrangements where:
The ATO’s primary concern in relation to these types of arrangements is the lack of commerciality which results in diverting profits attributable to a property development project to an SMSF at a concessionally taxed rate.
It is important to not only consider services provided by an individual trustee or director, but also those services provided by a related entity of an SMSF. In our experience, where no fee has been charged, based on the ATO’s guidelines within LCR 2021/2, the following expenses (though not a limited list) are likely to be classified as NALE:
It is therefore important to charge a fee and document the methodology used when related entities of an SMSF are providing these types of services.
Health Check
Planning and Advice
Following a review of arrangements where there is exposure risk to the NALI/NALE provisions, where it is determined that arrangements are not on arm’s length terms, we can provide an action plan to mitigate or reduce any exposure and bring arrangements onto arm’s length terms.
Where there is a history of non-arm’s length dealings, we can work with you and the ATO to solve the problem.